[OSM-dev] Osmosis Replication Statistics

Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu
Wed Aug 22 15:17:39 BST 2007


In message <2fc2c5f10708220700k27b3e33dh5be4752825a7dbb2 at mail.gmail.com>
        Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8/22/07, Brett Henderson <brett at bretth.com> wrote:
>
> > Now, back to the huge planet file.  I have no idea why the planet file
> > is so big.  My first thought was that my 12-month change application
> > process was wrong so I took a snapshot at 20070101 to verify the
> > results.  The files were *almost* identical in size.  The differences
> > are contained in the file attached to this email.
>
> There have been manual manipulations of the DB in the past: for
> example the TIGER import was removed by hand, maybe the history
> entries were neglected?

Yes - the TIGER data was not properly deleted. The visible flags were
set to false in the current tables but no history records were created
so they probably still look like they are visible in the history tables
at a guess.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/




More information about the dev mailing list