[OSM-dev] Mapnik rendering problem (Trac ticket #313)

[Artem Pavlenko]

Robert,

On Friday 23 February 2007 01:00, Robert Hart wrote:
> Ideally, I'd add this to trac, but can't seem to log in at the moment.
>
> I have some examples of ways that aren't rendered in the mapnik layer
> despite appearing on the osmarender layer and being perfectly valid on
> manual inspection.
>

Yes, I'll look into this. Thanks. 

Artem

> e.g.
>
> James Street in Bath
>
> Compare tiles:
>
> http://tile.openstreetmap.org/16/32337/21829.png
> http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/Tiles/tile.php/16/32337/21829.png
>
> and snippet from .osm below.
>
> The only thing I don't understand are the timestamps. Are they created time
> or modified time? The way in question was only tagged in January, but has
> been left alone since. There are other ways in Bath with this problem.
>
>   <way id='167298' timestamp='2006-04-27 13:30:21'>
>     <seg id='291920' />
>     <seg id='333569' />
>     <seg id='333561' />
>     <seg id='21232986' />
>     <seg id='333562' />
>     <tag k='highway' v='unclassified' />
>     <tag k='name' v='James Street' />
>   </way>
>   <segment id='291920' from='333086' to='333660' />
>   <segment id='333569' from='333660' to='379926' />
>   <segment id='333561' from='379926' to='25251960' />
>   <segment id='21232986' from='25251960' to='379927'>
>     <tag k='created_by' v='JOSM' />
>   </segment>
>   <segment id='333562' from='379927' to='379921' />
>   <node id='333086' timestamp='2006-04-11 11:13:30' lat='51.3800182281377'
> lon='-2.36182798759546' /> <node id='333660' timestamp='2006-04-11
> 11:12:04' lat='51.380240192165' lon='-2.36232843887061' /> <node
> id='379926' timestamp='2006-04-11 11:13:31' lat='51.3804733889563'
> lon='-2.36282397060293' /> <node id='25251960' timestamp='2007-01-15
> 19:21:15' lat='51.3806548084385' lon='-2.36351829140601'> <tag
> k='created_by' v='JOSM' />
>   </node>
>   <node id='379927' timestamp='2006-04-11 11:12:01' lat='51.3807433889563'
> lon='-2.36385730393626' />
>
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl -
> www.mailcontrol.com