[OSM-dev] using current planet with osm2pqsql

[Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany)]

...
> Yes the planet.osm cause is understood but I'd still like to know why
> some installations don't see this. I'm looking to identify something
> like "this occurs in libxml2 version foo and later".
>
> I don't see much effort wasted in asking Joerg to tell me what his
> version of libxml2 is.

No it is almost no effort. And is a good hint for others to know when they 
need to sed. 

Both machines are debian testing and:

One machine has:
tweety at moby:~$ ls /usr/lib/*xml*.so*
/usr/lib/libixml.so                     /usr/lib/libwbxml2.so                  /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-nss.so.1
/usr/lib/libixml.so.2                   /usr/lib/libwbxml2.so.0                /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-nss.so.1.2.9
/usr/lib/libixml.so.2.0.3               /usr/lib/libwbxml2.so.0.0.9            /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-openssl.so.1
/usr/lib/libjinglexmllite-0.3.so.0      /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0      /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-openssl.so.1.2.9
/usr/lib/libjinglexmllite-0.3.so.0.0.0  /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0.3.1  /usr/lib/libxmlsec1.so.1
/usr/lib/libkabc_xmlrpc.so.1            /usr/lib/libxml++-2.6.so               /usr/lib/libxmlsec1.so.1.2.9
/usr/lib/libkabc_xmlrpc.so.1.0.0        /usr/lib/libxml++-2.6.so.2             /usr/lib/libxml-security-c.so
/usr/lib/libkcal_xmlrpc.so.1            /usr/lib/libxml++-2.6.so.2.0.7         /usr/lib/libxml-security-c.so.12
/usr/lib/libkcal_xmlrpc.so.1.0.0        /usr/lib/libxml2.so                    /usr/lib/libxml-security-c.so.12.0
/usr/lib/libknotes_xmlrpc.so.1          /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2                  /usr/lib/libxml.so
/usr/lib/libknotes_xmlrpc.so.1.0.0      /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.29             /usr/lib/libxml.so.0
/usr/lib/libopensync-xml.so.0           /usr/lib/libxmlada.so.2                /usr/lib/libxml.so.1
/usr/lib/libopensync-xml.so.0.0.0       /usr/lib/libxmlada.so.2.2              /usr/lib/libxml.so.1.8.17
/usr/lib/libsgxml.so.0                  /usr/lib/libxmlrpc++.so.0
/usr/lib/libsgxml.so.0.3.10             /usr/lib/libxmlrpc++.so.0.0.0

The other machine has:
ls -l /usr/lib/*xml*so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      17 2007-07-08 07:58 /usr/lib/libxml2.so -> 
libxml2.so.2.6.29
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      17 2007-07-08 07:58 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 -> 
libxml2.so.2.6.29
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1159208 2007-06-13 21:20 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.29

As what I remember; they both gave out the same error if I do not sanitize the 
input.