[OSM-dev] using current planet with osm2pqsql

Artem Pavlenko artem at mapnik.org
Tue Jul 17 08:11:18 BST 2007


Hi Joerg,

What 'locale' are you using? I wonder if setting it to "C" would help  
(just guessing here)

Artem

On 17 Jul 2007, at 07:48, Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany) wrote:

> ...
>> Yes the planet.osm cause is understood but I'd still like to know why
>> some installations don't see this. I'm looking to identify something
>> like "this occurs in libxml2 version foo and later".
>>
>> I don't see much effort wasted in asking Joerg to tell me what his
>> version of libxml2 is.
>
> No it is almost no effort. And is a good hint for others to know  
> when they
> need to sed.
>
> Both machines are debian testing and:
>
> One machine has:
> tweety at moby:~$ ls /usr/lib/*xml*.so*
> /usr/lib/libixml.so                     /usr/lib/ 
> libwbxml2.so                  /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-nss.so.1
> /usr/lib/libixml.so.2                   /usr/lib/libwbxml2.so. 
> 0                /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-nss.so.1.2.9
> /usr/lib/libixml.so.2.0.3               /usr/lib/libwbxml2.so. 
> 0.0.9            /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-openssl.so.1
> /usr/lib/libjinglexmllite-0.3.so.0      /usr/lib/ 
> libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0      /usr/lib/libxmlsec1-openssl.so.1.2.9
> /usr/lib/libjinglexmllite-0.3.so.0.0.0  /usr/lib/ 
> libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0.3.1  /usr/lib/libxmlsec1.so.1
> /usr/lib/libkabc_xmlrpc.so.1            /usr/lib/libxml+ 
> +-2.6.so               /usr/lib/libxmlsec1.so.1.2.9
> /usr/lib/libkabc_xmlrpc.so.1.0.0        /usr/lib/libxml++-2.6.so. 
> 2             /usr/lib/libxml-security-c.so
> /usr/lib/libkcal_xmlrpc.so.1            /usr/lib/libxml++-2.6.so. 
> 2.0.7         /usr/lib/libxml-security-c.so.12
> /usr/lib/libkcal_xmlrpc.so.1.0.0        /usr/lib/ 
> libxml2.so                    /usr/lib/libxml-security-c.so.12.0
> /usr/lib/libknotes_xmlrpc.so.1          /usr/lib/libxml2.so. 
> 2                  /usr/lib/libxml.so
> /usr/lib/libknotes_xmlrpc.so.1.0.0      /usr/lib/libxml2.so. 
> 2.6.29             /usr/lib/libxml.so.0
> /usr/lib/libopensync-xml.so.0           /usr/lib/libxmlada.so. 
> 2                /usr/lib/libxml.so.1
> /usr/lib/libopensync-xml.so.0.0.0       /usr/lib/libxmlada.so. 
> 2.2              /usr/lib/libxml.so.1.8.17
> /usr/lib/libsgxml.so.0                  /usr/lib/libxmlrpc++.so.0
> /usr/lib/libsgxml.so.0.3.10             /usr/lib/libxmlrpc++.so.0.0.0
>
> The other machine has:
> ls -l /usr/lib/*xml*so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      17 2007-07-08 07:58 /usr/lib/libxml2.so ->
> libxml2.so.2.6.29
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      17 2007-07-08 07:58 /usr/lib/libxml2.so. 
> 2 ->
> libxml2.so.2.6.29
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1159208 2007-06-13 21:20 /usr/lib/libxml2.so. 
> 2.6.29
>
> As what I remember; they both gave out the same error if I do not  
> sanitize the
> input.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>

Artem Pavlenko
http://mapnik.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20070717/8c5526d4/attachment.html>


More information about the dev mailing list