[OSM-dev] dev plans

[David Earl]

On 19/07/2007 08:42, spaetz wrote:
> It has become apparent that t at h is a de-facto part of OSM and that people love quick feedback for their rendering. So dev has effectively become a production server for t at h. I think we should acknowledge reality and act accordingly. I see 3 options:
> 1) Keep dev and t at h on one machine. That would require significant hardware upgrades
> 2) Move t at h top its own server (at the conference there were some people offering quite powerful machines) and make dev a development server
> 3) Make dev a t at h server and try to get a new machine to experiment with dev work (it that is deemed necessary).

The tilesathome list is currently discussing making t at h a widely 
distributed server network. The timescale may be different though.

David