[OSM-dev] Effort in the US wasted until TIGER import is complete?
Ludwig M Brinckmann
ludwigbrinckmann at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 11:01:10 GMT 2007
Would it not make much more sense to write something like an adapter, which
will allow people to read Tiger data from source as if it were an OSM
source, ie in the OSM XML format and update OSM renderers so that it is
possible to link in such adapters?
I always find data duplication a problem and an approach like this would
avoid the problem of having to deal with updates to whatever external
source are in use -- plus save a lot of space on the DB. Obviously this
means that OSM authors cannot modify data imported as such -- but with the
consistency problem I am not sure if they should.
Apologies, if this has been discussed in the past.
On 3/21/07, Robert (Jamie) Munro <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Thomas Lunde wrote:
> > Hello -
> > The TIGER page  indicates that the initial effort was removed from
> > the database because of data corruption.
> > Other postings seem to indicate that a new TIGER import will overwrite
> > existing US data.
> The other part of the problem was that the TIGER dataset was so huge it
> was slowing the servers down too much.
> Did someone say they had imported TIGER into PostGIS? Is it possible for
> them to provide that data somewhere for download, so that I can load it
> into my own PostGIS, and experiment with turning it into OSM data from
> there? I think that will be much easier than starting with raw TIGER data.
> Robert (Jamie) Munro
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dev