[OSM-dev] New JOSM version for 0.4 API
steve at asklater.com
Sun May 6 01:38:26 BST 2007
On 6 May 2007, at 00:19, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Steve mentioned that JOSM should
>> probably be preserving these in the saved data.
> Makes sense, but I don't understand what "visible" is for. Will the
> ever serve "invisible" records, and if so, how is JOSM expected to
First the API is not perfect (obviously).
Second, think of history APIs - they need to show whe things were
visible or not.
Thanks for your help fixing JOSM :-)
SteveC | steve at asklater.com | http://www.asklater.com/steve/
More information about the dev