[OSM-dev] josm bugs and enhancement requests
frederik at remote.org
Fri Oct 19 21:17:13 BST 2007
> If "we generally" do it this way, where has this been documented
> in the "Tagging" or "Editing" -page? This should be done.
I might run an analysis on the planet file some time and figure out how
many cases have been tagged one way or the other.
> So you also create 24 ways in the same place at a central tram-station
> because 24 tram-lines and bus-lines use that way?
No, you have to differentiate between the physical (there is a tram
track) and the logical (there are 24 lines using that). The former would
today be a way, the latter 24 relations.
> * It leads to errors. (In no editor will you see that there actually IS
> a second way in that place. Thus you will not notice
> missing parts of the second way)
As I said, this is one of many hundred ways in which our editors should
> * It is difficult to edit and will stay unintiutive to edit at best.
> * it wastes space (why bloat the db if we don't have to?)
> Reasons for it so far:
> * you want to be lazy in downloading parts of the map without
> filtering you output
Well you haven't managed to convince *me*, I still think that two ways
sharing the same nodes is the cleaner way to do it, but maybe you can
convince the others. I'm just saying how I do it and how I *think* the
others do it but in the end nobody is forced to follow any herd here, so
if you belive your way works better, then use it.
More information about the dev