[OSM-dev] Osmarender not always showing latest data

[Rowland Shaw]

All in that sort of time frame, so it looks like we've found our cause :)


2008/12/14  <milenko at king-nerd.com>:
> This could be the fault of my ROMA server.  The landuse way is not present on
> my server, although it does appear to be on the others and on the main API.
>
> I'm not sure how it's missing - my server must have somehow fallen out of sync
> at some point.  Potlach lists that way as being created Nov 28th 2008, were the
> other things you noticed missing also created around that time?
>
> -Jeremy
>
> Original Message -----------------------
> One example would be the landuse=residential around Trimley St. Martin at:
> It's (currently) on Mapnik at
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF
> But not on Osmarender layer per
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=0B00FTF
>
> And yes, the area is still in the data -- if you request a re-render,
> I expect it'll reappear (I haven't).
>
>
> 2008/12/14 80n <80n80n at gmail.com>:
>> Rowland
>> Can you make a couple of screen shots and describe what you see as being
>> wrong.  Then someone might be able to investigate further.
>>
>> 80n
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Rowland Shaw <rowland.shaw at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's done it again since my previous message, too...
>>>
>>>
>>> 2008/12/13 Rowland Shaw <rowland.shaw at gmail.com>:
>>> > Every so often, the T at H tiles show some really odd combinations of
>>> > data which show older versions of older nodes (for example, not
>>> > showing access=permissive which was added to a way) whilst still
>>> > showing newer ways that have been since added -- requesting a
>>> > re-render through Informationfreeway has fixed it on the occasions
>>> > I've noticed this.
>>> >
>>> > Primarily, I've noticed this in this sort of area:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.02923827991905&lon=1.2023025518558124&zoom=16&layers=0B000F000F
>>> >
>>> > At first, I thought someone had reverted several hours of work, but it
>>> > seems to be something else, that has now repeated itself two or three
>>> > times (that I'm aware of)
>>> >
>>> > Any ideas of the cause?
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev mailing list
>>> dev at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>