[OSM-dev] disputed areas - what changes to osm are required?
Marcus at Wolschon.biz
Sat Feb 9 15:58:47 GMT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gervase Markham schrieb:
| Tom Hughes wrote:
|> Unfortunately that's quite hard as we don't have bounding boxes for
|> ways so validating them against a bound is expensive. I wouldn't even
|> know how to start to geographically validate a relation...
| Ignoring relations for a moment, can we approximate the process of
| validating ways against bounds by validating the first and last nodes?
I do not thinkt his is a good idea. You need to validate all points
of a way.
So our requirements are:
* allow undo of commits
* def diffs including user-names and timestamps
~ for a bounding-box + time-range
* allow restricting or reviewing (better) edits of regions
(majority-vote, edit only by users that have been active for x days,
~ review by senior editor before commit to the database,...)
* What changes are required to the database-schema?
* What changes are required for the API?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dev