[OSM-dev] disputed areas - what changes to osm are required?

Gervase Markham gerv-gmane at gerv.net
Sat Feb 9 16:13:44 GMT 2008


Marcus Wolschon wrote:
> I do not thinkt his is a good idea. You need to validate all points
> of a way.

Why? It may mean that evil editors can edit a few ways which straddle 
the boundary of the bbox, but that's hardly a disaster. Make the bbox 
bigger.

Less is more; if checking all these boxes is a problem, let's use the 
99.5% approximation solution.

> So our requirements are:
> * allow undo of commits

Don't we already have this?

Gerv





More information about the dev mailing list