[OSM-dev] disputed areas - what changes to osm are required?
gerv-gmane at gerv.net
Sat Feb 9 16:13:44 GMT 2008
Marcus Wolschon wrote:
> I do not thinkt his is a good idea. You need to validate all points
> of a way.
Why? It may mean that evil editors can edit a few ways which straddle
the boundary of the bbox, but that's hardly a disaster. Make the bbox
Less is more; if checking all these boxes is a problem, let's use the
99.5% approximation solution.
> So our requirements are:
> * allow undo of commits
Don't we already have this?
More information about the dev