[OSM-dev] Mapnik Q: enhance resolution?
artem.mapnik at googlemail.com
Sun Mar 9 10:56:55 GMT 2008
On 9 Mar 2008, at 10:42, Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <18D7C55E-F25A-4222-B7C3-1CDD62346E02 at gmail.com>
> Artem Pavlenko <artem.mapnik at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Vector based symbols are on my TODO list. Should we aim to support
>> SVG (ie. tiny profile) ? Or something simpler like filled/stroked
>> paths would suffice ?
> I was assuming SVG personally - at the very least we probably want
> to provide a tool that can convert from SVG or something or it will
> be hard for people to create symbols.
Yes, subset of SVG makes sense.
>> Main problem with cairo - it is not reflected in Python bindings,
>> Should we have something like :
>> agg = agg_renderer(m, im)
>> cairo = cairo_renderer(m,im)
> I did look at this briefly - one issue is whether to wrap the cairo
> surface object that is passed to the renderer using boost::python as
> for everything else, or to use the existing cairo python bindings.
Good point. How about supporting both?
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
More information about the dev