[OSM-dev] 0.6 api - one more time
frederik at remote.org
Sat May 10 21:07:28 BST 2008
> I'm sorry to state with emphasis, that the OSM concept and format did
> *not* reach stability yet:
> It's simply lacking one of three basic geometry types, namely 'area' (or
> polygon or how you name it)!
I don't think sthat stability can be measured by the (non)presence of
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the dev