[OSM-dev] 0.6 api - one more time

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Sat May 10 21:07:28 BST 2008


>    I'm sorry to state with emphasis, that the OSM concept and format did
>    *not* reach stability yet:
>    It's simply lacking one of three basic geometry types, namely 'area' (or
>    polygon or how you name it)!

I don't think sthat stability can be measured by the (non)presence of
individual features.


Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

More information about the dev mailing list