[OSM-dev] 0.6 API clarifications and corrections

[bvh]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:02:04AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > But isn't old_version+1 always equal to version?
> Under the current plan, yes. We didn't think it was reasonable to
> push that assumption down to the clients thought.

Why would that be unreasonable? In what (futuristic) scenario would
version numbers not increment monotonically one by one?

cu bart