[OSM-dev] 0.6 API clarifications and corrections

Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-list at deelkar.net
Thu May 15 17:13:15 BST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave Stubbs schrieb:

> It's also possible for another changeset to edit the object in between
> as well, so this probably shouldn't be as transparent as "catapult"
> might suggest. The changeset data download will have to take this into
> account.

How do you handle rollback in such a case?


- --

Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFILGEbFUbODdpRVDwRAgErAJ0SL0QwUszcL7rDlFPCfvwbWnkz1gCgsrnl
oJS95F/abf3rYTsO186nmx8=
=Sq99
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3743 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20080515/eb2a5503/attachment.bin>


More information about the dev mailing list