[OSM-dev] SVN rails_port questions: browse, relicensing

[80n]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:

> Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > Tom Hughes wrote:
> >>> Also, I read from the foundation meeting minutes that the code to
> >>> handle the technical side of the planned license change has already
> >>> been mostly completed
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> There is some code on my hard disk that I will be working on
> >> completing over the next few weeks. As it isn't on a branch it
> >> probably won't be committed before it is ready to go live though. It
> >> isn't a huge amount of code though.
> >
> > Does your code take into account the plan that people should have the
> > option of saying "no", "yes", and "yes and by the way all my data is PD
> > anyway"?
>
> It implements the Foundation's relicensing plan - you'll have to discuss
> the details of that with the Foundation.


There has been no discussion of a PD option at any of the OSMF board
meetings that I have attended (I don't think I've missed any), and no
mention in any of the minutes from the License Working Group.

So, as far as I know, the answer is that the only options that have been
considered are YES or NO.

Etienne


>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
> http://www.compton.nu/
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20090212/b40e0d3b/attachment.html>