[OSM-dev] Ponderings about an improved tagging scheme
G H S
tiosancho at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 20 02:18:04 GMT 2009
I'm just getting started here, so I don't want to offend any founding members or dredge up a well beaten horse... BUT
Just looking through the data and some example tags, I was baffled as
to how the tags could be used effectively and consistently as they
stand today. They seem to have descriptive values on both sides of the
= sign. For example, "water=river", or "waterway=riverbank". Even
"highway=secondary" is a bit perplexing, since it seems to me that the
term "highway" is a value that answers the question, "What kind of way
What Steve has proposed is what I would have expected. I can already see adding a "natural" type, so I added a quick one to his page.
Is there something we're overlooking about the current scheme?
Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dev