[OSM-dev] 0.6 move and downtime (re-scheduled)

[Grant Slater]

Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> Wow... (serious wow) I have never seen the database THAT expanded 
>> unless I was using an XML database.
>
> And now I think of it; that is probably because *I* wasn't able to 
> download the history tables. That makes sense; but does it make sense 
> to have the history tables at all available on the same machine as the 
> main API database server :)
>
> History doesn't have to be quick so could be ran from an entirely 
> different database farm (a very very slow one).

And the highest row count table; the gps points table. (GPX imported data)

Partitioning outward will likely happen, just not yet... one step at a time.

Regards
 Grant