[OSM-dev] 0.6 move and downtime (re-scheduled)

[Stefan de Konink]

Grant Slater wrote:
> Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> Stefan de Konink wrote:
>>> Wow... (serious wow) I have never seen the database THAT expanded 
>>> unless I was using an XML database.
>>
>> And now I think of it; that is probably because *I* wasn't able to 
>> download the history tables. That makes sense; but does it make sense 
>> to have the history tables at all available on the same machine as the 
>> main API database server :)
>>
>> History doesn't have to be quick so could be ran from an entirely 
>> different database farm (a very very slow one).
> 
> And the highest row count table; the gps points table. (GPX imported data)
> 
> Partitioning outward will likely happen, just not yet... one step at a 
> time.

I think people will buy you more than just a cake when you finished ;)

Is the GPX point table downloadable now?


Stefan