[OSM-dev] PBF HeaderBlock optional?
Jochen Topf
jochen at remote.org
Tue Dec 21 16:42:59 GMT 2010
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 06:01:36PM -0600, Scott Crosby wrote:
> Yes. That is an osmosis bug. That header block is required.
>
> I would also like to thank you for your feedback and questions. I am working
> on a new release incorporating several API and design improvements that I
> hope to announce in a week or two. If you want a preview, please see the
> github repo.
I see you changed the name of the "HeaderBlock" to "OSMHeaderBlock". Maybe we
can find a different name here, because its still confusing there beeing a
"BlockHeader" also. Maybe "OSMMeta" or "OSMMetaData" or so?
Jochen
--
Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298
More information about the dev
mailing list