[OSM-dev] Improving History and Monitoring
Tom Hughes
tom at compton.nu
Sat May 7 17:05:51 BST 2011
On 07/05/11 16:39, Ian Dees wrote:
> It appears that OWL is the way forward then. Will you allow patches that
> use OWL's API to request history or will that fall under "no external
> services"? Presumably when OWL gets real hardware it will be a different
> machine but on the same network.
There's no reason somebody couldn't work on such patches. I'm a bit
reluctant to consider merging them before we have it production hardware
but I might be persuaded. It certainly wouldn't hurt to have the patch
ready though.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
More information about the dev
mailing list