[OSM-dev] Improving History and Monitoring

Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu
Sat May 7 17:05:51 BST 2011

On 07/05/11 16:39, Ian Dees wrote:

> It appears that OWL is the way forward then. Will you allow patches that
> use OWL's API to request history or will that fall under "no external
> services"? Presumably when OWL gets real hardware it will be a different
> machine but on the same network.

There's no reason somebody couldn't work on such patches. I'm a bit 
reluctant to consider merging them before we have it production hardware 
but I might be persuaded. It certainly wouldn't hurt to have the patch 
ready though.


Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)

More information about the dev mailing list