[OSM-dev] Filename extensions for OSM files
osm-lists at mazdermind.de
Wed May 11 12:48:39 BST 2011
Am 11.05.2011 13:42, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> On 05/11/11 13:23, Peter Körner wrote:
>> that way it is useful for a program to know, if a file fed into it via
>> stdin will be processed fine right from the start. nobody likes
>> processes that fail after 10 hours because of a missing
>> --this-is-an-history-file flag.
> Yeah, "fast failing" is probably the most useful effect of this. I've
> written programs that relied on proper ordering and would either
> explicitly fail or produce unexpected results at some time long into
> processing the input; if there had been an option to make my program
> fail unless you present it with sorted input, I might have used that.
The PBF-Format has it, so the only question is: do we want to change the
definition of the legacy xml format? Or would we rather just focus on
our new bling-bling-pbf-format and just leave the xml stuff as it is?
More information about the dev