[OSM-dev] osm2pgsql update

[Andy Allan]

On 24 November 2011 09:53, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Is anyone aware of multipolygon handling not working right when not using
> --slim? We might have to (re)introduce the primary key for osm_id at least
> on the polygon table to allow this deletion of duplicate areas.

I've always heard it stated the multipolygon handling is "unlikely to
work properly" in non-slim mode. But I honestly have no idea if anyone
seriously uses non-slim mode for any production services.

Cheers,
Andy