[OSM-dev] helping #switch2osm
SomeoneElse
lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk
Mon Jan 16 20:03:46 GMT 2012
On 16/01/2012 19:16, Roger Weeks wrote:
> Mapnik not being in git is just one of the many issues with this doc.
> For example, mapnik, if you get the current build from git, won't
> compile under Ubuntu 10.04. You've got to go back and get an earlier
> 2.0 version or add a PPA and get packages that other people have created.
>
If I was following some documentation that says to use a particular
version of something (say, Mapnik 0.7.1) I wouldn't expect to be able to
use some random newer version and expect to still be able to follow the
instructions. If the documentation was updated to say "and here's where
you get the version of Mapnik that these instructions were written for",
and that was somewhere that wasn't at the mercy of a third-party project
changing version control systems, then we'd be in the best of all
possible worlds.
A related issue is "mod_tile" - that's been changed (for valid reasons,
I'm sure) within the last couple of days so that the "make" in the
documention no longer works. Here again there doesn't seem to be a
"stable" version - the solution might be as simple as passing a date to
svn to get a "known good" version, but someone unfamilar with OSM
development wouldn't have a clue what date to pick.
> ... and a pre-configured VM would all be ideal ways to prevent this
> sort of thing from happening.
>
which would work, except that given the hardware needed to serve a map,
a VM is probably not ideal for most people. It also doesn't explain how
to get OSM running on a server that's already installed doing something
else. There are off-the-shelf black-box solutions out there already,
but they don't explain the integration process any - which is exactly
what
http://en.flossmanuals.net/openstreetmap/setting-up-your-own-tile-server/ and
before it http://weait.com/content/build-your-own-openstreetmap-server
do extremely well.
Cheers,
Andy
More information about the dev
mailing list