[OSM-dev] Timestamp in PBF files

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 11/21/2012 11:50 AM, marqqs at gmx.eu wrote:
> OK, this seems to be consensual: PBF id 18 in the header block for a signed int UNIX timestamp value.

In both his messages, Scott had suggested PBF id 18 for a signed int 
epoch value of the file creation, not for a signed int epoch value of 
the replication state.

It would probably be premature to call this a consensus for a 
replication state timestamp at PBF id 18.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"