[OSM-dev] Timestamp in PBF files
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Nov 21 11:26:34 GMT 2012
Hi,
On 11/21/2012 11:50 AM, marqqs at gmx.eu wrote:
> OK, this seems to be consensual: PBF id 18 in the header block for a signed int UNIX timestamp value.
In both his messages, Scott had suggested PBF id 18 for a signed int
epoch value of the file creation, not for a signed int epoch value of
the replication state.
It would probably be premature to call this a consensus for a
replication state timestamp at PBF id 18.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the dev
mailing list