[OSM-dev] Reverts from the woodpeck_repair account

[Pieren]

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Paweł Paprota <ppawel at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Not ignore it - for sure there needs to be a conversation with the author of
> the original changeset so that it is clear that such large changes should
> not happen without consultation.

This change has been widely and publicly discussed on the 2 mailing lists:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-October/054554.html
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-August/011230.html

> What I meant by my message is that we seem to be shooting ourselves in the
> foot in pursuit of "free tagging", "no rules" etc.

+1
You cannot complain in one side about OSM tagging complexity and block
all attempts to simplify it on the other side...

Pieren