[OSM-dev] Reverts from the woodpeck_repair account

[Ian Dees]

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Paweł Paprota <ppawel at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > What I meant by my message is that we seem to be shooting ourselves in
> the
> > foot in pursuit of "free tagging", "no rules" etc.
>
> +1
> You cannot complain in one side about OSM tagging complexity and block
> all attempts to simplify it on the other side...
>

I think we're trying to prevent "artificial" attempts to simplify. For
example, I don't like the amenity tag so I'm going to download all
amenity=* tagged items in the database and replace "amenity" with
"elephant" and upload it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20130102/851f605c/attachment.html>