[GraphHopper] Something wrong with bike routing?

[ratrun]

Hello Peter,

During the introduction of support for bicycle relations the weighting 
of highways of type cycleway, which are not part of a bicycle relation, 
unintentionally decreased in comparison to the previous versions. I 
guess that this is the difference you are seeing, because in the Benelux 
there are lots of cycleways.
Peter intends to introduce a "preference routing" feature shortly - see 
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/190, and I hope that 
this feature will allow easier tuning between the "fastest" and the 
"safest, nice" route.

regards,

ratrun

Am 30.04.2014 22:33, schrieb Peter Bryan:
> Hi all,
>
> The last few days (weeks?) I've noticed that graphhopper routes for 
> bicycles seem to have changed. Previously, graphhopper would take more 
> bike friendly roads like bicycle paths or quiet roads. Routes created 
> today seem to take bigger and busier roads, most suitable for cars. Is 
> there something wrong with bicycle routing? Of course, I prefer cycle 
> paths over busy roads.
>
> I've uploaded an example on GPS Visualizer with an old and a new route 
> between the same locations: 
> http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/display/20140430130842-45066-map.html
>
> The old track (created in March) is much better than the route I 
> created today. I've tried this on GPSies and graphhopper.com/maps 
> <http://graphhopper.com/maps> with the same results. Routing between 
> other locations have the same problem.
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing list
> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20140501/c8eee9c4/attachment.html>