[GraphHopper] access=no

[Laurent Bendel]

Hi Peter,
right, I was looking at the wrong place. Naively, I would think that ANY node of any way that has access=no would disqualify the way, would it take too much processing to take in account all nodes and not just a few select ones ? 

Laurent

PS: I’ll go ahead and just add a barrier=gate on those places anyway, it won’t hurt

On 22 janv. 2015, at 14:58, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Laurent,
> 
> barriers are handled but the border_control is not yet included in the potentialBarriers list. Please create an issue to fix this. Best would be to let me know some more candidates ;)
> 
> Here is the code for cars:
> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/blob/master/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/CarFlagEncoder.java#L76
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
> On 22.01.2015 11:58, Laurent Bendel wrote:
>> Ok. The reason I’m asking, is that I modified a node on Openstreetmap, flagging it with: access=no, but the routing algorithm still shows a route going « through » this node. After a quick look at the code (what I could figure out), I thought that the algorithm would take in account those cases, but obviously not. What should be the tagging to force the routing to avoid a road that is closed at some point ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Laurent
>> 
>> PS: the node in question is here:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3272543050
>> 
>> On 21 janv. 2015, at 15:48, Peter <graphhopper at gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Laurent,
>>> 
>>> we update the OSM data roughly every day.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> On 21.01.2015 15:44, Laurent Bendel wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> how often does the server at https://graphhopper.com/maps/ takes OSM updates from the central repository and recreates its graph ? because I’ve made some changes in OSM that I don’t see reflected in the results, so I’m wondering if it’s a problem of algorithm or just because it’s not updated yet.
>>>> 
>>>> Laurent
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GraphHopper mailing list
>>>> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GraphHopper mailing list
>>> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GraphHopper mailing list
>> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing list
> GraphHopper at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20150122/acb6936f/attachment.html>