[GraphHopper] ProGuard

Peter graphhopper at gmx.de
Sun Mar 1 20:38:55 UTC 2015


Hi Emux,

> Until now I was skipping the dem zip, but I would like to keep them in
the future.

With skipping I meant not excluding from the result just skip the
processing and proguard should let them untouched


> If you could have them as simple txt - as you have already the
translations - that would be indeed a fine solution.

not sure if this produces other problems, but we can try to solve this
in a separate issue.


> By the way, why the need to use several classes via reflection in GH code?

which one? In core GraphHopper there should be no reflection (except the
cleaner hack in the Helper class)

Peter

On 01.03.2015 21:33, Emux wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I think by default AS has ProGuard disabled (as Eclipse). It can be
> enabled easily in both IDE.
>
> Until now I was skipping the dem zip, but I would like to keep them in
> the future.
> I can insert them in the result but I would prefer a more pro approach.
> I have searched in ProGuard docs but have not found a fix.
>
> If you could have them as simple txt - as you have already the
> translations - that would be indeed a fine solution.
>
>
> By the way, why the need to use several classes via reflection in GH code?
> That's generally not recommended and produces again issues with
> ProGuard like tools.
> But at least those can be resolved somehow.
>
> -- 
> Emux
> Cruiser <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cruiser> - Atlas
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Atlas_%28navigation_application%29>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20150301/5ef4dd66/attachment.html>


More information about the GraphHopper mailing list