[GraphHopper] RFC: Improve tower/pillar node marking

Jan Soelter jan.soelter at graphhopper.com
Wed May 6 14:56:33 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Andreas,

> For that, I want to create two new classes/interfaces: a NodeMap, that
> encapsulates the source (OSM)->internal ID mapping, and a NodeTypeMap
> that uses the NodeMap to get the node type. The latter can probably be
> thrown away after preprocessing, I did not think that through till the
> end.
>
> What do you think of that approach? Is it a good idea? Or am I missing
> a part of the bigger picture that makes this unfeasible?
>

Indeed I think this is a very good idea. Basically to separate in the
import process "what" is provided, and "how" it is provided.

Cheers,
Jan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVSiubAAoJEOUh3viKQw2xSngH/1+NQRhZZe6Z3U5HWMKDG0GJ
R1/uSddwhFsGb31hY0SSEIVe2jN2Xo5xXfyOAraoNbY0CjLIdYhUCxxR7wg4a9l6
vWvitddy//c7VxfF6I22q279eiN+YH2gCY5RKkfNExCQNAqeHjGJsenMaiY/w+qT
BmR1WrlumsWGlah2QgT9b/f4r8EGKeg+ptSkiLtFAInTZIrLs+la2xK5+vNBhjgt
NhVrspKyaZLIWB2SrHLykNHXRQy5m5N9hpEbCBJ/gekNyEdBVsN7gSaf+BAS1Fob
VHKp1BAJX+Yv4S7jd5pTJPyEAd4m9xDg7OawS6/4sBnsW0LXcvtawZJFdWLNvz8=
=iqoV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20150506/4c9baafe/attachment.html>


More information about the GraphHopper mailing list