[Historic] "HOSM" or "OHM"?

[Jeff Meyer]

Hi Martin -

Good suggestions!

One of the beauties of going with Open Historical Map is that we already
have openhistoricalmap.org and openhistoricalmap.net.

See: http://www.openhistoricalmap.org:3000/ (temporary... may not be there
when you get there... ; ) )

- Jeff


On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> 2013/2/28 Jeff Meyer <jeff at gwhat.org>
>
>> All hail OHM!!!
>>
>> Ok - it seems like there's clear consensus here in the early results.
>> Let's tentatively go with Open Historical Map, barring any feedback in the
>> next few days that raises issues we haven't thought of.
>>
>>
>
> ohm.org seems to be for sale
> openhistorymap.org is registered by Ewan Klein in the GB, is this any of
> you?
>
> I'm fine with all names, also don't feel that HOSM would be too confusing,
> as the humanitarian branch is usually called HOT, but hosm.org is taken
> by C3 Computer Corporation ;-)
>
> openhm.org would be free, or maybe ohm.openstreetmap.org? or
> historic.openstreetmap.org?
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>



-- 
Jeff Meyer
Global World History Atlas
www.gwhat.org
jeff at gwhat.org
206-676-2347
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer> osm: Historical
OSM<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historical_OSM>
 / my OSM user page <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer>
 t: @GWHAThistory <https://twitter.com/GWHAThistory>
 f: GWHAThistory <https://www.facebook.com/GWHAThistory>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20130228/31643e76/attachment.html>