[Historic] "HOSM" or "OHM"?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2013/2/28 Jeff Meyer <jeff at gwhat.org>

> All hail OHM!!!
>
> Ok - it seems like there's clear consensus here in the early results.
> Let's tentatively go with Open Historical Map, barring any feedback in the
> next few days that raises issues we haven't thought of.
>
>

ohm.org seems to be for sale
openhistorymap.org is registered by Ewan Klein in the GB, is this any of
you?

I'm fine with all names, also don't feel that HOSM would be too confusing,
as the humanitarian branch is usually called HOT, but hosm.org is taken
by C3 Computer Corporation ;-)

openhm.org would be free, or maybe ohm.openstreetmap.org? or
historic.openstreetmap.org?

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20130228/738eef38/attachment.html>