[OHM] Fwd: Anyone with an interest in history should not contribute to OSM?
Lester Caine
lester at lsces.co.uk
Sat Nov 2 14:07:43 UTC 2013
Rob Nickerson wrote:
> p.s. I do differ in your opinion about iD as I see the importance of getting
> something "live" in a timely manner. I do however feel that they should not have
> marked it as the default quick as quickly as they did.
I understand why it was accelerated, but it still does not make it the right
editor as the 'default'. Even understanding where it is breaking things I still
don't trust it enough to use it for quick edits, and I have tried. Personally
I'd prefer to see an alternative being developed with a style sheet that we can
select to get away from that which is being forced on us. So JOSM and Potlatch2
will remain my own choice for some time to come. The 'style sheet' currently
used in ID is just about useless when overlaying the historic maps anyway ...
and any complaints about that have been brushed aside as well.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
More information about the Historic
mailing list