[OHM] date formats (was Re: Hidden Geo of NY's Gay Nightlife)

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Thu Apr 30 14:57:27 UTC 2015


On 4/30/15 10:47 AM, SK53 wrote:
> I really dont like this for OHM.
>
> The temporal side, is like the geo side, orthogonal to feature
> properties. While one can envisage plenty of short-term workarounds
> (at the moment we treat temporal aspects as feature properties), ones
> which mix concepts which one may later want to cleanly separate only
> lead to later grief.
>
i basically agree. moreover, as a guy who sometimes plays
database designer, i'm not at all comfortable putting data
on the key side of key=value, not at all; i regard it as pollution
of key space.

richard

-- 
rwelty at averillpark.net
 Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
 OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
 Java - Web Applications - Search

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20150430/ef225dfa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/historic/attachments/20150430/ef225dfa/attachment.sig>


More information about the Historic mailing list