[HOT] Including natural hazards in the HOSM data model?
s at henriod.info
Sun Apr 22 13:11:17 BST 2012
as promised, I have started a wiki page on this issue:
If you are interested in the question of natural hazards, please have a
look at it, comment, update and criticize!
"Le mot progrès n'aura aucun sens tant qu'il y aura des enfants malheureux"
-- Albert Einstein
"A journey does not need reasons. Before long, it proves to be reason
enough in itself. One thinks that one is going to make a journey, yet soon
it is the journey that makes or unmakes you." -- Nicolas Bouvier
Photos de voyages, photos de montagne: http://www.henriod.info
Skype: [image: Skype name: marmotte_la_gueuse]
Tajik mobile phone: +992 934 62 46 62
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 18:38, David Schmitt <david at black.co.at> wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 19:53, Stéphane Henriod wrote:
>> Thanks David,
>> If I understand correctly, your position on this issue is that:
>> * Creation of OSM-compliant natural hazard data should be encouraged
>> * This data might not be stored in the main OSM repository (planet.xml)
>> * This data should be consistent with existing tags and ontologies
>> * This data should be rendered with appropriate symbology
>> In other words, we should aim at a fork-project (openhazardmap.org
>> <http://openhazardmap.org> for instance) that will:
>> * Store specific hazard-related data
>> * Store TMS specifications for appropriate rendering
>> * Mashup the hazard data on appropriate data from planet.xml
>> Am I right? Anyone having a different opinion?
> Great summary. Additionally I'd add
> * OSM(F) should pursue to create/publish/integrate the tools and
> processes to facilitate this.
> but that's probably out of scope for this list.
> Best Regards, David
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT