[HOT] New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing
Robert.Banick at redcross.org
Thu Dec 26 15:10:38 UTC 2013
I proposed the switch to a "damage=" tag to this community about a month ago and received a positive response, albeit from few voices. When I brought this up again at SOTM-PH it was also well received. As such I think we should switch to using the "damage=" tagging schema and move away from tagging damages in the building tag.
The rendering on this may lag at the moment but is easy enough to catch up - Yohan has already signaled that he can switch quickly.
Robert Banick | Field GIS Coordinator | International Services | Ì American Red Cross<http://www.redcross.org/>
2025 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
Tel 202-303-5017 | Cell 202-805-3679 | Skype robert.banick
From: Severin MENARD <severin.menard at gmail.com<mailto:severin.menard at gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 1:14 PM
To: "hot at openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>" <hot at openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>>
Subject: [HOT] New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing
Wanting to contribute to the post-disaster assessments in Philippines, I read the discussion about tags and rendering. As Pierre's tip about the mapcss was useful for everyone, I added it in the workflow tab in the job I wanted to contribute (http://tasks.hotosm.org/job/360). Would be good to have a defintive statement regarding Jonathan's questions and put it in the workflow as well, so that there is no doubt about the tagging.
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:42:29 +0000
From: Jonathan <bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com<mailto:bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com>>
To: hot at openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [HOT] [talk-ph] New Task: Carles Post-Disaster Tracing
Message-ID: <52B5B6E5.5020505 at gmail.com<mailto:52B5B6E5.5020505 at gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Excellent heads up with this styesheet.
It has highlighted to me a possible confusion I have.
There are 3 building scenarios as I understand it: 1. Undamaged Building
2. Damaged Building 3. Destroyed Building
The tagging I understand for those three are:
1. Undamaged Building
2. Damaged Building
3. Destroyed Building
So, in 2 & 3 there is no longer a [building] tag and the stylesheet
paints it Green. In 1 there is no [damage] tag but the stylesheet
doesn't paint it green even though it has [typhoon:reviewed] tag?
Any ideas. Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT