[HOT] [Tasking Manager] enhancements - testers required
Pierre GIRAUD
pierre.giraud at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 21:09:14 GMT 2013
Agreed.
Taken into account.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Pierre Béland <infosbelas-gps at yahoo.fr>wrote:
> Hi Pierre
>
> In the Users tab, I agree to remove the stats for each user. It should be
> enough to highlight for each user the tasks done.. I also agree to remove
> the Validate option. When we invalidate, we have the option to give a
> comment. This would also be a good option to send and email to the user.
>
> To show the tiles to be selected, I prefer the light grey like in the
> previous version. I find this less confusing the the red color.
>
> There are two circumstances where the message to invalidate a tile is
> showed. I would treat these two events differently as described below.
>
> Event 1. The user locked a tile to work on; when he click to Mark task as
> done, the tile is still selected and the Invalidate button message is
> showed. It would probably be better to unselect the tile and show the Take
> a task message.
>
> Event 2 : The user selects a tile already done; in this case, both the
> Invalidate button and the Clear selection option should be offered.
>
> Pierre
>
> ------------------------------
> *De :* Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com>
> *À :* Augustin Doury <augustin.doury at hotosm.org>
> *Cc :* HOT Openstreetmap <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> *Envoyé le :* Dimanche 13 janvier 2013 15h30
> *Objet :* Re: [HOT] [Tasking Manager] enhancements - testers required
>
> Ok, I've gone further with my experimentations.
> I'm really not satisfied with the validation workflow and I've tried to
> change it completely.
>
> I'm convinced that it's not really a requirement to be able to "validate"
> tiles. It appears (looking at the statistics) that very few tiles have been
> marked as valid in the past jobs. I suppose that's because validation
> itself is not easy. It's easy to tell that a tile in invalid though. Thus,
> it's really a requirement to be able to "invalidate" tiles.
> In the version currently installed on dev server, the "validation" button
> doesn't exist anymore. The tiles can now take only 2 statuses "done" or
> "not done". Colors have been changed too. They're now more "common" to
> people's habits and they match the buttons colors too.
> Also, there's no need to lock a tile to tell it's invalidate. I think this
> should be a quick process.
>
> I intend to add a "message box". Users could for example receive messages
> from the application to be informed that a tile they previously worked on
> has been invalidated.
>
> One other thing I changed is the "users tab". I simplified things by
> removing the numbers telling how much the users worked. As someone already
> told me, this is not a race. We don't need a winner.
> What I added though is the availability to see which tiles the given users
> worked on by highlighting them on the map. This feature has been asked
> several times.
>
> Once again, feedbacks are welcome.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Augustin Doury <augustin.doury at hotosm.org
> > wrote:
>
> Sorry for this second email, I just want to add something about this point
> of my last email :
>
> 1) Limit how many times you could split the tasks, for a zoom level of 17,
> maybe not more than once.
> > sometimes tasks are splitted twice or more, it really slows the mapping.
>
> On the "users" page,the number of tiles done by a contributor could depend
> on the size of the tiles he has done :
> - if he did not split tiles, show "1" for one tile
> - if he did, show "0,25" for one tile which is from a tile splitted once.
>
> Augustin
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Augustin Doury <augustin.doury at hotosm.org
> > wrote:
>
> Hi! Couple things I realized this morning using the Tasking Manager :
>
> 1) Limit how many times you could split the tasks, for a zoom level of 17,
> maybe not more than once.
> > sometimes tasks are splitted twice or more, it really slows the mapping.
>
> 2) Make it easy to find which task you're working on,
> In the current version all "current worked on" tasks are highlighted in
> orange, maybe the task linked to your OSM account could be highlighted in
> an other colour.
>
> 3) It's too easy to delete a task, it could be great to add one step more
> for security checking
>
> Great to imagine how the new version will be!
>
> Augustin
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Augustin Doury <augustin.doury at hotosm.org
> > wrote:
>
> Thanks for that Pierre! Here are some comments :
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
> - with this in mind, tiles url (in the address bar) can be used to be
> shared to someone else. This might be useful to use a tile as reference in
> a discussion between mappers,
>
>
> > this is a real enhancement, especially with new mappers who want to
> have their work checked or to share it easily. I would use it like every
> week.
>
>
>
> - comments are now required when marking a task as done or (in)validating
> one,
>
>
> > great, it could be good to have an informative message to explain what
> kind of comment is expected,
> > maybe the person who create the job could choose this informative
> message.
>
>
> - users have access to the tile change history.
>
>
> > this is a real enhancement too I think
>
>
>
> Please write down any problems you see and your good or bad feelings.
>
>
> Something that could be great on the Tasking Manager's "users" page :
>
> By clicking on the OSMid of a contributor or a validator, be able to :
>
> - know which tile he has edited
> - know which tile he has marked as "done"
> - which tile he has validated
> - and be able to select it easily and open it in "read-only" mode.
> Great for quality assurance with new mappers, and great to find which tile
> you have worked on yesterday.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Off topic question:
> I'm not sure how important the locking is when an advanced user wants to
> (in)validate the work done on a job.
> How about allowing validation without any lock. Or maybe we should rethink
> the validation process.
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> > when a new register click on a task marked as done, he uses to validate
> or invalidate it quickly and don't think to just click on "unlock-it"...
> I think a new validation process could be great, let it open for everybody
> but be sure that all validators did it in an informed way and don't
> validate or invalidate a task by mistake.
>
>
>
> Pierre
>
> [1] http://tasks-dev.hotosm.org
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> | Pierre GIRAUD
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
> --
> Augustin Doury
> Openstreetmap Senegal Community Mobilizer
> Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team (HOT)
> +221773160902 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +221773160902
> end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> +221773160902 end_of_the_skype_highlightingbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> +221773160902 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>
>
>
>
> --
> Augustin Doury
> Openstreetmap Senegal Community Mobilizer
> Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team (HOT)
> +221773160902 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +221773160902
> end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> +221773160902 end_of_the_skype_highlightingbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> +221773160902 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>
>
>
>
> --
> Augustin Doury
> Openstreetmap Senegal Community Mobilizer
> Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team (HOT)
> +221773160902
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> | Pierre GIRAUD
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
| Pierre GIRAUD
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20130115/c60b10ee/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the HOT
mailing list