[HOT] Validating & TM2 - providing feedback to new mappers

David Schmitt david at black.co.at
Sun Aug 31 22:34:31 UTC 2014


Hi,

gamification seems to be a hot trend lately. My understanding of this 
is a clear communication of (community) goals and closing the feedback 
cycle to individual contributors. Counting validated squares may be a 
good proxy for a user's efficiency. It may not be the most finegrained, 
and lead to people trying to game the system. Also, like Dan S said, 
only reinforce positive contributions, non-improving contributions 
require a learning impulse and vandalism should be handled quietly.

I also like Mikel's idea of microtasking validation. I'd guess that 
scoring an individual building on a green/yellow/red scale in a 
specifically designed webapp to reduce effort would be much easier than 
working with josm+browser and trying to judge whole squares. Also it 
might improve the feedback as in "This building should be drawn square 
on the foundations, not including it's roof's shadow."


Regards, David

On 2014-08-31 09:07, Severin Menard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thinking aloud, would not be possible (actually asking tech people) 
> to
> have a tool allwing the following:
> - detecting changesets with hotosm hashtags and picking up the
> username
>  - comparing the username to a list of HOTOSM contributors and 
> stating
> if it is new or not and already validated for a certain numbers of
> quality items (like drawing buildings correctly, drawing roads
> correctly, tagging roads correctly, etc.)
>  - when contributors have not been validated yet, a task is sent to a
> validation team
> - one team member picks up the task, check, validate the work of the
> contributor and contact her/him if some mistakes. A form would be
> great, with checkboxes for typical errors, and if making a typical
> one, the contributor would receive in the answer link to the Learning
> point (there are already quite a few in LearnOSM) dedicated to this
> error
>  - once done the hotosm contributor quality status for this
> contributor would be: good for such and such aspects, bad for such 
> and
> such ones and the latter would then be tasked in the future for
> validators as soon as this contributor would submit a new changeset
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Severin
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Nick Allen <nick.allen.54 at gmail.com
> [7]> wrote:
>
>> Pierre,
>>
>> A help channel or some form social help channel would be good, but
>> in order to ask for help, the mapper needs to realise they are doing
>> something wrong, or dont know how to do something.
>>
>> The new mappers in this thread are consistently asking for someone
>> to check their work, and provide feedback so they know what to do to
>> improve. The validation process is good for this as well as quality
>> control - but it would be nice if we made it easier for the new
>> mapper to receive the comments, and if needed for the validator to
>> pass them.
>>
>> I dont know if it is easily achievable, but perhaps a system where
>> the validators comments are more easily available to the mapper,
>> unless they opt to not receive them. I know that MSF & BRC were keen
>> to offer help, and I know that the few mappers that have replied to
>> this thread are asking for this feedback.
>>
>> It would be good if more mappers replied, especially if they are
>> new, so we have an idea as to whether it is worth investigating
>> further.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Nick (Tallguy)
>>
>> --
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Volunteer Tallguy for
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team [1]
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tallguy [2]
>>
>> Treasurer, website & Bonus Ball admin for
>> http://www.6thswanleyscouts.org.uk/ [3]
>> (treasurer at 6thswanleyscouts.org.uk [4])
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org [5]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot [6]
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team
> [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tallguy
> [3] http://www.6thswanleyscouts.org.uk/
> [4] mailto:treasurer at 6thswanleyscouts.org.uk
> [5] mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org
> [6] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> [7] mailto:nick.allen.54 at gmail.com




More information about the HOT mailing list