[HOT] Bolivian Floods: "landuse=forest" or "natural=wood"?
pierzenh at yahoo.fr
Mon Feb 10 03:09:15 UTC 2014
It is suggeste to use natural=wood for Natural forests andlanduse=forest for Managed forests. And I dont think that there are much managed forests in the area.
Mappers shoud find experienced mappers on the HOT irc irc://irc.oftc.net/#hot and the more general OSM irc irc://irc.oftc.net/#osm
De : "hyances at gmail.com" <hyances at gmail.com>
À : HOT <hot at openstreetmap.org>
Envoyé le : Dimanche 9 février 2014 21h33
Objet : [HOT] Bolivian Floods: "landuse=forest" or "natural=wood"?
Some of us are tracing polygons over tree areas, ones are using "landuse=forest" others "natural=wood" ¿which you consider more indicated? Mapping trees could be helpful for high level floods.
By the way, trying to give answer to question below, I'm wondering about the best communication channel to gather all mappers of the task, when they are comming form diferent countries and talk-xx mailing list, some could be missing information and sharing knwoledge about best mapping practices is a key factor for quality data (specially remote one); so experienced mappers could guide newers.
Just arise the idea to include a chat in task page
But, in present ¿any suggestion?
(copy from OSM inbox)
10 febrero 2014 a las 01:43
Hello, exactory. I think so too.
I wrote them as same as surrounding "landuse=forest"s. But must be represented as "natural=forest".
Did you contact other mappers already?
On 2014-02-10 01:36:21 UTC Humberto_Yances wrote:
Hi, Same as you I'm currently mapping on task 418 and kidly want to comment about using "landuse=forest" to map tree areas. It looks more as "natural=wood", beacause is not a manmade tree farming; just natural free grow trees.
HOT mailing list
HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT