[HOT] Trees

Tom Taylor tom.taylor.stds at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 01:18:45 UTC 2014


One reason is if the tree is a significant landmark.

Tom Taylor

On 12/11/2014 7:27 PM, john whelan wrote:
> I'm happy and content and they are much easier to map than buildings but I
> just wondered if there was any logic behind it other than they had grown
> tired of mapping buildings.
>
> Thanks John
>
> On 12 November 2014 19:14, Blake Girardot <bgirardot at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't think you missed anything in the Project instructions for
>> individual trees. But with the missing maps project, OSMGeoWeek and other
>> assorted welcome to mapping type events it just be someone who thought it
>> would be fun to map in a few trees. I saw a couple of those recently when
>> doing some validation.
>>
>> So that is my guess: Someone just wanted to map in some trees for fun
>> and/or experimentation with mapping, tagging and/or rendering. As Bob Ross
>> might ask: "Who doesn't like happy little trees?"
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:45 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I know they're nice but why would anyone spend time mapping trees rather
>>> than buildings in a HOT area?  Or did I miss something in the tasks?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Cheerio John
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>



More information about the HOT mailing list