[HOT] Fwd: huts.

Daniel Specht danspecht at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 02:09:10 UTC 2015


An example of this is #892 - Ebola Outbreak, Guinea, Kindia Prefecture,
Road network and settlements, task 77.  Lots of the residential areas have
only these barely visible round things.


Dan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Daniel Specht <danspecht at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:09 AM
Subject: huts.
To: HOT at openstreetmap.org


Oops -- didn't mean to send that last one.  Question about huts -- in West
Africa there are a lot of huts, sometimes just out in the forest with no
rectangular buildings or clearings nearby.  Are these for storage?
Temporary housing?

Dan



Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 18:55:45 -0500
From: john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
To: "hot at openstreetmap.org" <hot at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: [HOT] Validation
Message-ID:
        <CAJ-Ex1F3+N6dHh62xnjNazs-p-Q8HLMLX77BVd_+ZU78SR51Hg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Mapping in Africa from satellite images I find I'm adding perhaps half a
dozen settlements when I validate, they're quite quick and easy to do.
Some are huts and are not quite so easy to spot.

Question at what point should I invalidate?  The question arises when
perhaps I've added a dozen settlements and half a dozen highways, I'm
fairly experienced so fairly comfortable the work is OK after I've added in
the validation but there is the question that I've added a dozen
settlements and no one else will be validating.

I'm looking more for pragmatic answers more than anything else, there is a
concern that if I invalidate a tile it may demotivate a mapper and at the
moment we have a lot of tiles to map.

Thanks

Cheerio John

-- 
Dan



-- 
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20150216/facc0874/attachment.html>


More information about the HOT mailing list