[HOT] HOT] paths, tracks and unclassified in West Africa

john whelan jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 22:02:40 UTC 2015


Do we follow the same standards in different places on different projects?
I deliberately did not mention Nepal and the built up areas are different.

Cheerio John

On 14 July 2015 at 17:38, Andrew Patterson <andrewvhp at gmail.com> wrote:

> Whilst I fully accept the concept of open debate in an attempt to reach a
> consensus, I do find the current discussion less than helpful, because of
> the range of definitions being thrown out, and the added geographic
> dimension to the definitions.  This is not helped by the variety in advise
> in the instructions for various tasks - ranging from "if in doubt mark it
> as a path, and this can be upgraded by someone on the ground" to much more
> specific instructions in the Nepalese instructions, for example.  But the
> type of terrain in which one might contemplate a 4 wheel drive in Africa is
> very different to that regularly used in Nepal.
>
> Surely if must be possible to come to a conclusion for a generic set of
> definitions.  I rather support John Whelan's breakdown, where he suggests
> that "if its to a small group of huts its probably a track, if
> its to narrow for a 4X4 and winds its a path, and if I can see two wheel
>> tracks then its a track unless its between two settlements of reasonable
> size then its unclassified
> ​"​
> .
>
> ​There was a huge correspondence in a similar vein during the early days
> of the Nepal disaster, which I found to be a real disincentive to
> contributing during the first couple of weeks, and I have only latterly
> started working on task.  There has also been an impressive and important
> Post Mortem exercise to improve things, and I would suggest that the size
> of the preset list is one area in which some serious pruning could be done
> with consequent increase in transparency to a new comer
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Patterson
>
> The information contained in this e-mail and any
> files transmitted with it is confidential and intended for the addressee
> only.
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20150714/b5a3c200/attachment.html>


More information about the HOT mailing list