[HOT] Source=PGS issue on 917 task 98

[john whelan]

So for the moment I'll validate it.

Thanks John

On 13 March 2015 at 14:18, Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi John
>
> PGS source, this is old imports of varying quality defining the coastal
> areas. Mapping the area, I also saw those polygons that seem to delimit
> wetlands but do not fit with the imagery.
>
> Effectively, I think that we can later revise all of this and remove.
>
>
> Pierre
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *De :* john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
> *À :* "hot at openstreetmap.org" <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> *Envoyé le :* Vendredi 13 mars 2015 13h37
> *Objet :* [HOT] Source=PGS issue on 917 task 98
>
> /917#task/98 has 27 ways marked with this.  Fifteen have no other tags on
> them.  Twelve have natural=water tags but to be honest they don't seem to
> tie up with the satellite imagery at all.
>
> I am aware of
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prototype_Global_Shoreline but none of
> these have natural=coastline
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline> tags.
>
> My inclination would be to zap the lot but could some one with more
> specialist knowledge look it over.
>
> Thanks John
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20150313/380cccea/attachment.html>