[HOT] #1024 landuse=brownfield + landuse=residential

Pierre Béland pierzenh at yahoo.fr
Sat May 2 18:18:36 UTC 2015

I think that we should keep the duplicates for now.
We are in the emergency and did not had time to think about the various problems when we created this job.
I prefer that we keep duplicate, otherwise we would loose info about the residential area. 

It should be easy to mange once the job is completed and revise the landuse=brownfield. 

We can define a nepal earthquake event related tag to report this and facilitate later the database management.

      De : "hyances at gmail.com" <hyances at gmail.com>
 À : S Volk <svolk2 at hotmail.com> 
Cc : "hot at openstreetmap.org" <hot at openstreetmap.org> 
 Envoyé le : Samedi 2 mai 2015 13h34
 Objet : Re: [HOT] #1024 landuse=brownfield + landuse=residential
I think a better aproach to this could be update previous polygon tags, from "landuse=residential" to "landuse=brownfield" and erase duplicated polygon.
2015-05-01 17:55 GMT-05:00 S Volk <svolk2 at hotmail.com>:

Hi, please, one question:I'm tracing a "landuse=brownfield" poligon for recently disappeared homes (comparing DigitalGlobe 2015-04-29 with both Bing and MapGive / HIU april 2015 images, ) over a place where there was already a "landuse=residential" poligon (probably will be a common case). I ask: is it ok, doesn't it happen any kind of conflict for a "landuse" over another "landuse", like conflict in rendering brownfield over residential, or any kind of conflict for identification? // Also, no sign of tents in the neigborhood of these demolished buildings, confirming reports that rescue haven't arrived yet to many distant place. // Thanks - Sérgio (user:SergioAJV) 
HOT mailing list
HOT at openstreetmap.org

HOT mailing list
HOT at openstreetmap.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20150502/6f9f086e/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list