[HOT] #1024 landuse=brownfield + landuse=residential

hyances at gmail.com hyances at gmail.com
Sat May 2 17:34:31 UTC 2015

I think a better aproach to this could be update previous polygon tags,
from "landuse=residential" to "landuse=brownfield" and erase duplicated

2015-05-01 17:55 GMT-05:00 S Volk <svolk2 at hotmail.com>:

> Hi, please, one question:
> I'm tracing a "landuse=brownfield" poligon for recently disappeared homes
> (comparing DigitalGlobe 2015-04-29 with both Bing and MapGive / HIU april
> 2015 images, ) over a place where there was already a
> "landuse=residential" poligon (probably will be a common case). I ask: is
> it ok, doesn't it happen any kind of conflict for a "landuse" over another
> "landuse", like conflict in rendering brownfield over residential, or any
> kind of conflict for identification? // Also, no sign of tents in the
> neigborhood of these demolished buildings, confirming reports that rescue
> haven't arrived yet to many distant place. // Thanks - Sérgio
> (user:SergioAJV)
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20150502/0c7868f6/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list