[HOT] very small round objects in project/1048#task/90

[Steve Bower]

If it is small and you are uncertain if it is a building, then I would not
trace it as a building (particularly if there are no signs of occupation -
paths or enclosures and such). Even if it is a building, it's most likely a
hut and not significant to the relief effort (or other applications).

Caveat: I didn't view the sample you refer to, but I have seen similar
objects to what you describe.

Steve

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> When you ask to validate objects like this, try to be more specific. The
> best would be to give us the ID of one of these objects or to zoom in and
> give us the osm url to point more precisely to this zone (Ctrl-J in JOSM).
>
>
> Pierre
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *De :* john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
> *À :* "hot at openstreetmap.org" <hot at openstreetmap.org>
> *Envoyé le :* Samedi 16 mai 2015 16h07
> *Objet :* [HOT] very small round objects in project/1048#task/90
>
> Start at the bottom left and you'll see them in the fields.  I suspect its
> crops drying out they look very small for huts to me.  Some have been
> mapped as buildings.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks John
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20150516/78cb544b/attachment.html>