[HOT] Level of user experience to focus on
Katja Ulbert
mail at katja-ulbert.de
Fri May 29 08:54:51 UTC 2015
Hi Shelby,
there is a photo collection that helps identifying objects on the ground
and getting familiar to the Nepalese terrain, part of it is also
geotagged https://www.flickr.com/photos/katja-ulbert/collections
I know it doesn´t answer all your questions, but maybe it can give you
some hints.
Katja
Am 29/05/15 um 10:05 schrieb Shelby Canterford:
Am 29/05/15 um 10:05 schrieb Shelby Canterford:
> Hello all. I have just signed up and this conversation seemed a good
> time to jump in. I went through all the learning materials and had a
> go at a tile. Of course having a go led to more questions. One of my
> main concerns is just how I make the judgement of "this stream is too
> small to map", and how much I should try and guess about roads/paths
> surface etc. It would be really helpful for me if there was a field
> guide about what the features I am looking at might be considered
> roads or paths etc. I am trolling through the list archives to see if
> some of my questions are already answered, but that's tedious! I would
> actually like a test/mentoring system, then at least I would know if
> I'm rubbish or not! I work in EM, and do my own basic GIS stuff, I
> consider myself educated generally. But understanding classifications
> of unfamiliar infrastructure is beyond my ken.
>
> Thanks,
> Shelby
>
>
> On 29/05/2015 5:37 PM, Suzan Reed wrote:
>> When I came on board, I wondered why there weren't learning materials
>> I had to study, and then a test to be sure I was ready to map. (There
>> are people who put that kind of material together, and I know someone
>> who does just that.)
>>
>> I also wondered why I was able to contribute to any task instead to
>> being routed to tasks meant especially for newcomers, with a
>> mentoring team watching over my work, giving me suggestions for
>> improvements.
>>
>> Required reading and a mapping test? Routing newbies to tasks where
>> they are reviewed by mentors? I would have liked that.
>>
>> Suzan
>>
>>
>> On May 28, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:57 +0000, Rekth K wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thank you for all your welcoming messages!
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask a question on what type(s) of user(s) to take into
>>> consideration when testing for usability and suggesting
>>> improvements. In
>>> other words, for what level of experience am I supposed to optimise the
>>> Tasking Manager? Should it be for first time visitors, those who
>>> land on
>>> the hotosm page and do not know what HOT is? Or should the usability
>>> testing lean towards fully experienced users and their needs?
>> At the risk of sounding slightly elitist, I really think we should
>> mostly assume at least minimally experienced users who have at least
>> done some armchair mapping in their country and/or local area mapping
>> partially aided by aerials. I say this for two practical reasons:
>>
>> 1. A humanitarian mapping project is not the time and place to learn how
>> to properly use iD or JOSM.
>> 2. The quality of work tends to correlate positively with level of
>> mapping experience.
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
More information about the HOT
mailing list