[HOT] Squared buildings
Dale Kunce
dale.kunce at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 15:55:13 UTC 2016
+1 Mike. The need to draw square buildings is really a check to have new
mappers draw more *accurate* buildings.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:11 AM, <me at chrisfleming.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Are non squared building really a big deal, apart from visually? Can we
>> not live at least initially with building as traced?
>>
> If the angles are 90+/- some little bit I don't think it would matter.
> The problem is that once you remove the requirement for squaring some
> (usually very new) mappers will draw grossly distorted buildings. These
> are so visually unappealing as to reduce the usefulness and trustworthiness
> of the map IMHO.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
--
sent from my mobile device
Dale Kunce
http://normalhabit.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160414/bf10f443/attachment.html>
More information about the HOT
mailing list