[HOT] Building Detection using Machine Learning

john whelan jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 23 23:12:40 UTC 2016

Currently my thoughts run along the lines of use it to identify areas with
buildings.  Same as Mapswipe?, heavens things get outdated so quickly these
days and Mapswipe hasn't been around for that long.

Secondly if you map them but tag them with something like
possiblebuilding=yes then they wouldn't show on a render but could be
selected in JOSM with a todo list plugin and switched to building=yes on
inspection. I think that would meet the workflow side of things that
Fredrick suggested in osm-talk.

Imports, automated edits and image detection software do not have a history
of being problem free in OSM and I think you have to take that into account.

Cheerio John

On 23 December 2016 at 17:46, Robert Banick <rbanick at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Phillip,
> I think Andrew, John, etc. have well covered the practical relevance to
> OSM. On a technical note you may consider looking into what the Facebook
> data team is doing: https://code.facebook.com/posts/1676452492623525/
> connecting-the-world-with-better-maps/
> I believe a lot of it is based on building detection via machine learning.
> Robert
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:07 PM Andrew Buck <andrew.r.buck at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I agree with what the others have said so far... this probably won't be
>> used to feed into the main database but could have other uses.
>> One place where it could be good is in very sparsely populated areas
>> like northern Africa, where there are huge areas of empty space with a
>> few isolated settlements.  In the past we used micro tasking to have
>> users quickly scan though and find village locations and then manually
>> mapped the buildings using the microtask results to find the villages to
>> map.  This worked very well and your algorithm looks robust enough to
>> find the majority of villages.  Also in that case false positives are no
>> problem at all as the mapper just won't map anything when they look
>> there and false negatives are not such a big deal (as long as you
>> identify at least one building in the village the mapper can map the
>> rest themselves anyway).
>> Lastly, this could be used to re-check already mapped villages to see if
>> they need to be revisited to map new buildings, etc.  You could scan an
>> area and for each village spit out a set of numbers of how many
>> buildings are in both datasets, how many are only in yours, and how many
>> are only in OSM.  Based on that we can prioritize areas to be re-looked
>> at by human mappers to update to the new imagery.
>> So all in all this is a very useful tool to have in our toolbox, but
>> just not for direct inclusion into the main database.
>> -AndrewBuck
>> On 12/19/2016 08:17 AM, Philip Hunt wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I attended my first Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) mapping event
>> a few months ago and was interested to see how successful machine learning
>> would be at detecting buildings in satellite images. The results look
>> promising but I wanted to know if it could be useful to the community and
>> if it’s worth pursuing further. I thought I would post a sample of the
>> results and then quickly explain the process and issues.
>> >
>> >
>> > Results
>> > ———
>> >
>> > These are the results of a test I ran on project 2101 (Rongo, Kenya -
>> PMI/USAID) on 1 November 2016. These images show the buildings detected by
>> the algorithm on the first six unstarted tasks from the project. Potential
>> buildings are marked with green rectangles:
>> >
>> > https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/hot-osm-ml-test-data/2101_4.png
>> > https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/hot-osm-ml-test-data/2101_5.png
>> > https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/hot-osm-ml-test-data/2101_9.png
>> > https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/hot-osm-ml-test-data/2101_12.png
>> > https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/hot-osm-ml-test-data/2101_13.png
>> > https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/hot-osm-ml-test-data/2101_14.png
>> >
>> > As you can see the initial results look promising - most of the
>> buildings have been detected and the false positive rate is pretty low.
>> >
>> >
>> > Process
>> > ————
>> >
>> > I’ve been using the Viola–Jones machine learning algorithm, which
>> requires training to know what is and isn’t a building. Once the algorithm
>> is trained, it can be used to detect buildings in new images in a few
>> seconds.
>> >
>> > The whole process looks like this:
>> >
>> > - Get the HOT project and task data using the HOT API
>> > - Get the satellite imagery of the area from OSM
>> > - Get the nearby existing buildings from the OSM API
>> > - Find the existing buildings in the satellite imagery and use these to
>> train the algorithm
>> > - Run through each incomplete task in the HOT project and detect
>> buildings
>> > - Output the results as OSM XML
>> > - Load the output into JOSM, validate and upload to OSM
>> >
>> >
>> > Issues
>> > ———
>> >
>> > I loaded the output of the algorithm into JOSM and completed tasks 1
>> and 2 of project 2101. However it still took a bit of work to make sure the
>> data is good enough for OSM and I think an experienced mapper would have
>> taken roughly the same amount of time starting from scratch.
>> >
>> > The main issue is the algorithm can’t rotate the detected rectangle to
>> fit the building shape (as you can see from the example images above, none
>> of the rectangles are rotated). I’ve tried using methods such as line
>> detection to detect the building and rotate and crop the rectangle around
>> the edges - this worked well some of the time and other times went horribly
>> wrong.
>> >
>> > The second issue is false positives. While the examples above we’re
>> generally clean, sometimes the algorithm would think a field was a
>> building. Because data uploaded to OSM needs to be accurate it can take
>> some time checking each potential building in JOSM.
>> >
>> > Another potential issue could be training samples. When testing I
>> trained a new algorithm for each project, using local existing building
>> data from OSM as training data. The assumption here is that nearby
>> buildings will look like buildings in the project area and that nearby
>> building data is available and accurate.
>> >
>> >
>> > Next Steps
>> > —————
>> >
>> > The Viola–Jones objection detection research paper was first published
>> in 2001 so the algorithm has been around for a while. Machine learning has
>> improved since then and neural networks are showing a lot of promise -
>> using these could increase the reliability and also allow the detected
>> rectangle to be fixed around the edge of the building - meaning a lot less
>> editing in JOSM. I’m also aware of similar projects, but I haven’t found
>> anything that’s able to detect buildings or ready for use yet:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/trailbehind/DeepOSM (find misconfigured roads in
>> OSM)
>> > https://github.com/patrick-dd/landsat-landstats (predicts population
>> size)
>> > https://github.com/larsroemheld/OSM-HOT-ConvNet
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm not suggesting this could replace volunteers (since algorithms will
>> never be completely accurate), but maybe this could help speed things up or
>> be used to quickly estimate building locations over large areas.
>> >
>> > Please let me know your thoughts. Could this could be a useful tool for
>> HOT or any other volunteer organisations and is it worth taking any further?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Philip Hunt
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > HOT mailing list
>> > HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20161223/a930a161/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list